Tuesday, December 18, 2012

Blue Blazes


Blue Blazes

The trail to Rufus Morgan falls starts in the Nantahala National Forest outside Franklin, North Carolina. This area of North Carolina is a tropical rainforest, so why name it Nantahala? Nantahala means “Land of the noon day sun”. So, why would you name it that if it rains so much? Well, the mountains in this section of the Appalachian mountains are very steep and the sun only reaches the floor in some places when it is directly overhead, as in noon. Hence, Nantahala.

Nantahala is a Cherokee Indian word. I “learned” about the Cherokee Indians in 8th Grade at Monroney Junior High School in Midwest City, Oklahoma. I never went to “Middle School”. We were in Oklahoma because my dad was stationed at Tinker Air Force Base, flying Boeing 707s for the FAA. I had to take Oklahoma History and that's where I learned about the Five Civilized Tribes, of which the Cherokee was one. We weren't taught that the Cherokees had be forcefully removed from their home in the Appalachian Mountains. Nobody mentioned that Cherokee means, “Those who live in the mountains”. That named doesn't even make sense in Eastern Oklahoma, where they live now: No wonder they called it the “Trail of Tears” when they walked to Oklahoma in the 1830's. Five tribes (Cherokee, Chickasaw, Choctaw, Creek, and Seminole) were chosen to be ripped from their good lands in the East, because of my ancestors greed for land. In Oklahoma, the tribes were assimilated into the European-American culture and technologies. In other words, they were profoundly screwed. This point was overlooked in my all white, middle-class Junior High Oklahoma History class.

I did, however, learn a few things in Oklahoma and the most valuable were not learned in the classroom. First, I learned to love the outdoors, which is why I'm hiking the Rufus Morgan trail in the first place. I immersed myself in Boy Scouts and became a Eagle in 1963. I held tightly to Scouting because of the pain I was suffering at home. My father was an alcoholic, and a mean one. He beat my mom when he was drunk, which was after work on Friday until the following Monday morning. He rarely “came out” on the weekends. He just drank, slept, and drank some more. If my mother interfered, he became very ugly, sometimes hitting her. So, to escape all that, I turned to Scouting. My parents made enough money to let me go to Philmont Scout Ranch during the summer after 9th grade.

Philmont change me. I loved the mountains, the forest, the ruggedness of it all. I decided “this is what I want to do”, although I didn't know what “this” meant. (Now that I think about it, I guess I still don't.) It was a great summer. Backpacking before there were backpacks and all the super light-weight gear. Cooking with firewood, not white gas. Sleeping under a sheet of plastic, not ripstop nylon. Everything was too heavy, making it that much more of a challenge. We didn't know any better.

It was also during this time in Oklahoma that my character traits started to manifest themselves. I stuck with it and made Eagle Scout. But when it came time to buy my musical instrument, I had to make decision: trumpet or cornet. I chose cornet because my band director advised me that there are many cornets in the Midwest City High School orchestra, but only two trumpets. One would have to be extremely good to be selected as a trumpet player. So I gave up. I did know it at the time, but I was afraid of failure, so I gave up. I didn't realize it yet that I was a perfectionist and would not proceed if there was chance of failure. I got that from my alcoholic father. It's genetic. It's one of the seminal traits of alcoholism. And it has stopped me cold more than once. I just didn't know it at the time.

I'm an only child. I don't know if there are universals about only children, but I know for me, a couple of things emerged. One, I was Sargent Major of the Band, which was the title bestowed on the top student leader. I was the Senior Patrol Leader of my Boy Scout troop, which is also the top leadership position. I was emerging as a leader.

In sports, I didn't do team sports. Swimming, wrestling, and track were my sports. I wasn't too good, but I enjoyed participating in them. Since I was in band, I couldn't participate in team sports like football or baseball. I sucked at them anyway. I got to play football, basketball, and baseball when we lived in Fort Worth but that was because they let everyone play in those days. The idea was to play. It was before we as a society became obsessed with winning (at all costs). One of those costs being, mediocre kids like me don't get to play. We missed out on the fun, and that makes an impression, even if it's subconscioius. All that is overcome by events these days by all the cuts to education: sports is a luxury most schools cannot afford. It's too bad. As President George H.W. Bush said, “Sports is good for the soul”. I agree, especially if it's used as a tool for “inclusion”.

I reach the first blaze on the Rufus Morgan trail. It's blue and it's painted on. It's the new Forest Service. Blazes use to be carved into the tree trunk with an axe. They stood out, white, like the white blaze on a horse's head. They are used to mark the trail, to help you stay on course as you proceed or find your way back should you become lost. I'm following the blazes to a water fall on a trail in memory of Rufus Morgan.

I first came across the word "rufus" as a Wildlife Science student at Texas A&M. It means "red" or "reddish" or "red-headed". I saw my first Rufous Hummingbird at the Black Gap Wildlife Management Area in the Transpecos area of Texas near Big Bend National Park. I was there during the summer between my Junior and Senior years to do field work. Wildlife students were required to either work for the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department or do six week of field work with a TAMU wildlife professor. My guy was Arnold, an ornithologist. He knew a lot about birds, but he was a jerk; very little respect or hands-on with the students. He didn't talk to us much. He was arrogant. Not much of a "teacher". His teaching assistant however wasn't that way and he spent a lot of time with us helping us identify birds in the field and "birds in the box". We had lots of preserved bird specimens in a large wooden box and for our "test" we had to memorize the scientific names and the natural history of all the birds in the box (about 100).

That's not the way the John C. Campbell Folk School, Brasstown, North Carolina, would have done it. They use the Danish folkenojskole method which is teaching primarily through discussion and conversation. Reading and writing are not emphasized; most instruction is hands-on. What a way to learn wildlife ecology. Blaze.

During my time at Texas A&M, my personality and character continued to develop and expresses themselves. I started in Biology. I did alright grade-wise, but there was a foreign language requirement. I was totally afraid that I'd fail. I took Latin 1 three times in high school to get the required "year of foreign language". I believed I had no aptitude for language, so I switched from Biology to Wildlife Science: no language requirement. Another major decision based on fear, but I didn't recognize it at the time. I also had a very bad, memorable experience in my "Comparative Cordate Anatomy" class. Dr. Dobson was the professor, and I liked him, but he lied to us at the end of the course. When we asked him what was going to be on the final, he said, "Everything you haven't been tested on already". That meant a lot to me since I had good notes and knew what that meant. But that's not what was on the final: it was everything. So I went from an A to a C. I'll never forget the "draw and label" the shark skull question. (We'd already been tested on that and it's not something that stayed in my long-term memory.) Being lied to by a professor I really respected was a hard lesson. Another blaze on the trail of life.

My character continued to develop along the same lines. I continued to be a leader (Commanding Officer of the White Band) and I became more fearful. I started drinking seriously as a junior and was totally alcoholic by my senior year. I would never have said so. Being an alcoholic was an impossibility for me since my dad was an alcoholic. I didn't want to be like him, so as long as I was not mean and beating my wife (which I didn't have), I wasn't an alcoholic. I just stayed drunk. And failed almost all of my courses. I blamed everyone but myself: professors, the bulls (officers) in the Trigon, or the Corps (taking too much time). I didn't recognize what was happening. My parents kept paying and didn't ask any questions. I was completely selfish and self-centered. I didn't know it. I was very isolated even though I was the commander. I was also full of fear: of not being good enough, of failure. Always thinking about me. I had to do another year to graduate. And then the Air Force didn't take me. Vietnam was winding down and they were cutting back the officer corps. They didn't need me! Blaze.

Back to the Rufous Hummingbird (Selasphorus rufus ). The scientific name means red-headed, light-bearing hummingbird. It's a spectacular animal and once you've seen it, you know how it got it's name. He was one of the birds in the box. And I like it that he spell's his name like Rufus Morgan: Rufus (Latin) vs. Rufous (Anglicized).

Rufus Morgan was an Episcopalian minister for Franklin, North Carolina, who was an early conservationist and preservationist. He cared about his congregations and he cared about the Appalachian Mountains. He modelled his approach to life on St. Francis of Assisi. He tried to live the Prayer of St. Francis:

Oh, Lord our Christ, may we have Thy mind and Thy spirit. Make us instruments of Thy peace. Where there is hatred, let us sow love; where there is injury, pardon; where there is discord, union; where there is doubt, faith; where there is despair, hope; where there is darkness, light; where there is sadness, joy. Oh, divine Master, grant that we may not so much seek to be consoled as to console; to be understood, as to understand; to be loved, as to love; for it is in giving, that we receive. It is in pardoning that we are pardoned, and it is in dying to self that we are born to eternal life.
Which is all pretty weird because St. Francis is a Catholic Saint. And Catholics aren't real big in this part of North Carolina. But if you're going to model your life after a Saint, St. Francis is a good one to pick. He was a little too extreme for me, but his pray does provide some good guidance. It leads to the Serenity Prayer:
God, grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change, the courage to change the things I can, and the wisdom to know the difference.
Today, because of much pain, almost to the point of death, I have some understanding this prayer. I cannot change anything but myself. I have no power to change people, places, or things. Even though I've been a leader for most of my life, I cannot change people, places, or things. I can change myself. I don't because of fear. The same old fear that's been with me all these decades: a fear of failure. At least now, I recognize it and know that I can work on what I can change: myself and my attitudes.
My core sin is greed. For me, it's a desire for more knowledge and the belief that if I read just one more book or take one more course, I'll "get it right". That's not true of course and a least I recognize it. I recognize my fear of looking dumb, of looking stupid, of not knowing. And I'm starting to let go of that deadly sin. Blaze.
I'm starting to look at core values, the things that really matter. I believe relationships, a job of service, and family are the important things. Relationships being the hardest for me. I have and always have had a good job. I have a family that loves me. I have a family to love. But relationships for me are hard. I have always lived, "You leave me alone and I'll leave you alone". And that doesn't work. What I am starting to believe, especially with my peers, is:, "Everyone at this table has suffered" and that's a common bond which I can build upon. Blaze.
The directions to the Rufus Morgan waterfall say to return on the same trail after visiting the falls. So, since the trail kept going, we weren't sure if these falls were "the fall" when we saw them. The falls are neat. Falling about 60 feet through heavy vegetation. The water flows to the Wayah River. Wayah means wolf in Cherokee, so it tells you something about the wildlife that use to be in this country. The cabin Catherine and I are staying in is on this river about 5 road miles from here; a crow could fly directly and that'd be about the square root of 13 miles away. We got the directions from the owner of the cabins.
We keep going. The trail continues on and we find a tightly built spide web with a recent catch. But we can't see the spider. We expected him to attack as soon as the prey was in the silk, but it didn't happen. We intend to check again on our return trip. We continue on.
Coyote scat on the trail. (Wayah of today.) Nothing unusual about that; use the trails too. Much easier. But there's a large snail, like a garden snail, which we usually kill, eating the scat! Ecology in action.
We continue on following the blue blazes, looking for "the" waterfall. And we arrive back at the road about 20 meters from our car! It's a loop. Why had the directions told us to return on the same trail we had come up after seeing the waterfall? Is this part of a trail new? We should tell the cabin owner so she can update the directions.
Carl Sandburg
who am I, and where have I been, and where am I going?”
I'm following the blazes laid out for me by God. And although I'm following them, just like on the Rufus Morgan trail, I don't know where I'm going. My guess is, I'm going to return to where I started: a love of nature, mountains, the outdoors. Only during this leg of the journey, I don't have to do it alone.
If someone asks me, "Where in the blue blazes have you been", I know to just smile, because now I know for the first time.

(We never did find out what happened with the spider  on the downhill side of the Rufus Morgan trail.)











where in the blue blazes have you been?” blaze = fire =hell
patch of white on a horse's head = bark from a tree” W
mark the trail in
blaze a trail...find your way back --- carel sandburg.




Thursday, December 6, 2012

DX Questions


What do you treasure most?

What talent or ability would you like to have?

Who are your heroes and why?

What words best describe you?

What is your happiest memory?
 
What would you like written on your tombstone?


What is the best advice you would give to someone turning 20?

What guests would you invite to your fantasy dinner party?
 
What do you consider your greatest accomplishment as of today?


What is something most people don’t know about you and you wish that they did?

Turing's Cathedral

Very interesting conversation on youTube.


YouTube: Turing's Cathedral. Author George Dyson in Conversation with John Hollar


Humility - Dr. Bob

Humility


"Perpetual quietness of heart. It is to have no trouble. It is never to be fretted or vexed, irritable or sore; to wonder at nothing that is done to me, to feel nothing done against me.

"It is to be at rest when nobody praises me, and when I am blamed or despised, it is to have a blessed home in myself where I can go in and shut the door and pray to my Father in secret and be at peace, as in a deep sea of calmness, when all around and about is seeming trouble. "

Wednesday, December 5, 2012

Starting Over with a Clean Slate

This is an article from the NY Times, "Killing the Computer to Save It"
It's a profile of Peter G. Neumann.  He's interesting.
His home page is good: http://www.csl.sri.com/users/neumann/

His Wikipedia page is very sparse:  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_G._Neumann

Here are my notes:
SRI International
Complex systems break in complex way.

He's 80 and starting over with a clean slate.

"Clean Slate" project:

  • Re-think complexity.
  • 5 year project.
  • Tilting at windmills


ACM = RISK Forum

DARPA - information innovation office

Music - Tai Chi - Computer Science

Turing's Cathedral
Fred Brooks, IBM 360





MENLO PARK, Calif. — Many people cite Albert Einstein’s aphorism “Everything should be made as simple as possible, but no simpler.” Only a handful, however, have had the opportunity to discuss the concept with the physicist over breakfast.


One of those is Peter G. Neumann, now an 80-year-old computer scientist at SRI International, a pioneering engineering research laboratory here.
As an applied-mathematics student at Harvard, Dr. Neumann had a two-hour breakfast with Einstein on Nov. 8, 1952. What the young math student took away was a deeply held philosophy of design that has remained with him for six decades and has been his governing principle of computing and computer security.
For many of those years, Dr. Neumann (pronounced NOY-man) has remained a voice in the wilderness, tirelessly pointing out that the computer industry has a penchant for repeating the mistakes of the past. He has long been one of the nation’s leading specialists in computer security, and early on he predicted that the security flaws that have accompanied the pell-mell explosion of the computer and Internet industries would have disastrous consequences.
“His biggest contribution is to stress the ‘systems’ nature of the security and reliability problems,” said Steven M. Bellovin, chief technology officer of the Federal Trade Commission. “That is, trouble occurs not because of one failure, but because of the way many different pieces interact.”
Dr. Bellovin said that it was Dr. Neumann who originally gave him the insight that “complex systems break in complex ways” — that the increasing complexity of modern hardware and software has made it virtually impossible to identify the flaws and vulnerabilities in computer systems and ensure that they are secure and trustworthy.
The consequence has come to pass in the form of an epidemic of computer malware and rising concerns about cyberwarfare as a threat to global security, voiced alarmingly this month by the defense secretary, Leon E. Panetta, who warned of a possible “cyber-Pearl Harbor” attack on the United States.
It is remarkable, then, that years after most of his contemporaries have retired, Dr. Neumann is still at it and has seized the opportunity to start over and redesign computers and software from a “clean slate.”
He is leading a team of researchers in an effort to completely rethink how to make computers and networks secure, in a five-year project financed by the Pentagon’s Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, or Darpa, with Robert N. Watson, a computer security researcher at Cambridge University’s Computer Laboratory.
“I’ve been tilting at the same windmills for basically 40 years,” said Dr. Neumann recently during a lunchtime interview at a Chinese restaurant near his art-filled home in Palo Alto, Calif. “And I get the impression that most of the folks who are responsible don’t want to hear about complexity. They are interested in quick and dirty solutions.”
An Early Voice for Security
Dr. Neumann, who left Bell Labs and moved to California as a single father with three young children in 1970, has occupied the same office at SRI for four decades. Until the building was recently modified to make it earthquake-resistant, the office had attained notoriety for the towering stacks of computer science literature that filled every cranny. Legend has it that colleagues who visited the office after the 1989 earthquake were stunned to discover that while other offices were in disarray from the 7.1-magnitude quake, nothing in Dr. Neumann’s office appeared to have been disturbed.
A trim and agile man, with piercing eyes and a salt-and-pepper beard, Dr. Neumann has practiced tai chi for decades. But his passion, besides computer security, is music. He plays a variety of instruments, including bassoon, French horn, trombone and piano, and is active in a variety of musical groups. At computer security conferences it has become a tradition for Dr. Neumann to lead his colleagues in song, playing tunes from Gilbert and Sullivan and Tom Lehrer.
Until recently, security was a backwater in the world of computing. Today it is a multibillion-dollar industry, though one of dubious competence, and safeguarding the nation’s computerized critical infrastructure has taken on added urgency. President Obama cited it in the third debate of the presidential campaign, focusing on foreign policy, as something “we need to be thinking about” as part of the nation’s military strategy.
Dr. Neumann reasons that the only workable and complete solution to the computer security crisis is to study the past half century’s research, cherry-pick the best ideas and then build something new from the bottom up.
Richard A. Clarke, the nation’s former counterterrorism czar and an author of “Cyber War: The Next Threat to National Security and What to Do About It” (Ecco/HarperCollins, 2010), agrees that Dr. Neumann’s Clean Slate effort, as it is called, is essential.
“Fundamentally all of the stuff we’re doing to secure networks today is putting bandages on and putting our fingers in the dike, and the dike springs a leak somewhere else,” Mr. Clarke said.
“We have not fundamentally redesigned our networks for 45 years,” he said. “Sure, it would cost an enormous amount to rearchitect, but let’s start it and see if it works better and let the marketplace decide.”
Dr. Neumann is one of the most qualified people to lead such an effort to rethink security. He has been there for the entire trajectory of modern computing — even before its earliest days. He took his first computing job in the summer of 1953, when he was hired to work as a programmer employing an I.B.M. card-punched calculator.
Today the SRI-Cambridge collaboration is one of several dozen research projects financed by Darpa’s Information Innovation Office as part of a “cyber resilience” effort started in 2010.
Run by Dr. Howard Shrobe, an M.I.T. computer scientist who is now a Darpa program manager, the effort began with a premise: If the computer industry got a do-over, what should it do differently?
The program includes two separate but related efforts: Crash, for Clean-Slate Design of Resilient Adaptive Secure Hosts; and MRC, for Mission-Oriented Resilient Clouds. The idea is to reconsider computing entirely, from the silicon wafers on which circuits are etched to the application programs run by users, as well as services that are placing more private and personal data in remote data centers.
Clean Slate is financing research to explore how to design computer systems that are less vulnerable to computer intruders and recover more readily once security is breached.
Dr. Shrobe argues that because the industry is now in a fundamental transition from desktop to mobile systems, it is a good time to completely rethink computing. But among the biggest challenges is the monoculture of the computer “ecosystem” of desktop, servers and networks, he said.
“Nature abhors monocultures, and that’s exactly what we have in the computer world today,” said Dr. Shrobe. “Eighty percent are running the same operating system.”
Lessons From Biology
To combat uniformity in software, designers are now pursuing a variety of approaches that make computer system resources moving targets. Already some computer operating systems scramble internal addresses much the way a magician might perform the trick of hiding a pea in a shell. The Clean Slate project is taking that idea further, essentially creating software that constantly shape-shifts to elude would-be attackers.
That the Internet enables almost any computer in the world to connect directly to any other makes it possible for an attacker who identifies a single vulnerability to almost instantly compromise a vast number of systems.
But borrowing from another science, Dr. Neumann notes that biological systems have multiple immune systems — not only are there initial barriers, but a second system consisting of sentinels like T cells has the ability to detect and eliminate intruders and then remember them to provide protection in the future.
In contrast, today’s computer and network systems were largely designed with security as an afterthought, if at all.
One design approach that Dr. Neumann’s research team is pursuing is known as a tagged architecture. In effect, each piece of data in the experimental system must carry “credentials” — an encryption code that ensures that it is one that the system trusts. If the data or program’s papers are not in order, the computer won’t process them.
A related approach is called a capability architecture, which requires every software object in the system to carry special information that describes its access rights on the computer, which is checked by a special part of the processor.
For Dr. Neumann, one of the most frustrating parts of the process is seeing problems that were solved technically as long ago as four decades still plague the computer world.
A classic example is “buffer overflow” vulnerability, a design flaw that permits an attacker to send a file with a long string of characters that will overrun an area of a computer’s memory, causing the program to fail and make it possible for the intruder to execute a malicious program.
Almost 25 years ago, Robert Tappan Morris, then a graduate student at Cornell University, used the technique to make his worm program spread throughout an Internet that was then composed of about only 50,000 computers.
Dr. Neumann had attended Harvard with Robert Morris, Robert Tappan Morris’s father, and then worked with him at Bell Laboratories in the 1960s and 1970s, where the elder Mr. Morris was one of the inventors of the Unix operating system. Dr. Neumann, a close family friend, was prepared to testify at the trial of the young programmer, who carried out his hacking stunt with no real malicious intent. He was convicted and fined, and is now a professor at M.I.T.
At the time that the Morris Worm had run amok on the Internet, the buffer overflow flaw had already been known about and controlled in the Multics operating system research project, which Dr. Neumann helped lead from 1965 to 1969.
An early Pentagon-financed design effort, Multics was the first systematic attempt to grapple with how to secure computer resources that are shared by many users. Yet many of the Multics innovations were ignored at the time because I.B.M. mainframes were quickly coming to dominate the industry.
Hope and Worry
The experience left Dr. Neumann — who had coined the term “Unics” to describe a programming effort by Ken Thompson that would lead to the modern Unix operating system — simultaneously pessimistic and optimistic about the industry’s future.
“I’m fundamentally an optimist with regard to what we can do with research,” he said. “I’m fundamentally a pessimist with respect to what corporations who are fundamentally beholden to their stockholders do, because they’re always working on short-term appearance.”
That dichotomy can be seen in the Association for Computing Machinery Risks Forum newsgroup, a collection of e-mails reporting computer failures and foibles that Dr. Neumann has edited since 1985. With hundreds of thousands, and possibly millions, of followers, it is one of the most widely read mailing lists on the Internet — an evolving compendium of computer failures, flaws and privacy issues that he has maintained and annotated with wry comments and the occasional pun. In 1995 the list became the basis for his book “Computer-Related Risks” (Addison-Wesley/ACM Press).
While the Risks list is a reflection of Dr. Neumann’s personality, it also displays his longtime interest in electronic privacy. He is deeply involved in the technology issues surrounding electronic voting — he likes to quote Stalin on the risks:, “It’s not who votes that counts, it’s who counts the votes” — and has testified, served on panels and written widely on the subject.
Dr. Neumann grew up in New York City, in Greenwich Village, but his family moved to Rye, N.Y., where he attended high school. J. B. Neumann, Dr. Neumann’s father, was a noted art dealer, first in Germany and then in New York, where he opened the New Art Circle gallery after moving to the United States in 1923. Dr. Neumann recalls his father’s tale of eating in a restaurant in Munich, where he had a gallery, and finding that he was seated next to Hitler and some of his Nazi associates. He left the country for the United States soon afterward.
His mother, Elsa Schmid Neumann, was an artist. His two-hour breakfast with Einstein took place because she had been commissioned to create a colorful mosaic of Einstein and had become friendly with him. The mosaic is now displayed in a reference reading room in the main library at Boston University.
Dr. Neumann’s college conversation was the start of a lifelong romance with both the beauty and the perils of complexity, something that Einstein hinted at during their breakfast.
“What do you think of Johannes Brahms?” Dr. Neumann asked the physicist.
“I have never understood Brahms,” Einstein replied. “I believe Brahms was burning the midnight oil trying to be complicated.”

This article has been revised to reflect the following correction:
Correction: November 1, 2012

An article on Tuesday about Peter G. Neumann, a computer scientist whose focus is security, misstated the name of the organization whose Risks Forum newsgroup is edited by Dr. Neumann. It is the Association for Computing Machinery, not the Association of Computing Machinery.

Heisenberg Principle - Observer Effect

The Observer Effect modelnetic:
People's behavior changes if they know the boss is watching.

Historically, the Heisenberg uncertainty principle has been confused with a somewhat similar effect in  physics, called the observer effect, which notes that measurements of certain systems cannot be made without affecting the systems.

In physics, the term observer effect refers to changes that the act of observation will make on the phenomenon being observed. This is often the result of instruments that, by necessity, alter the state of what they measure in some manner. A commonplace example is checking the pressure in an automobile tire; this is difficult to do without letting out some of the air, thus changing the pressure

Tuesday, December 4, 2012

Old Testament

What you hate, do not do to others.  What you hate done to you , don't do to others.

"What you hate for yourself, do not to your neighbor. This is the whole Law, the rest is commentary."

Obedience

1 Sam 15

1 Samuel said to Saul, 'I am the man whom Yahweh sent to anoint you as king of his people Israel, so now listen to the words of Yahweh.
2 This is what Yahweh Sabaoth says, "I intend to punish what Amalek did to Israel -- laying a trap for him on the way as he was coming up from Egypt.
3 Now, go and crush Amalek; put him under the curse of destruction with all that he possesses. Do not spare him, but kill man and woman, babe and suckling, ox and sheep, camel and donkey." '
4 Saul summoned the people and reviewed them at Telaim: two hundred thousand foot soldiers (and ten thousand men of Judah).
5 Saul advanced on the town of Amalek and lay in ambush in the river bed.
6 Saul said to the Kenites, 'Go away, leave your homes among the Amalekites, in case I destroy you with them -- you acted with faithful love towards all the Israelites when they were coming up from Egypt.' So the Kenites moved away from the Amalekites.
7 Saul then crushed the Amalekites, beginning at Havilah in the direction of Shur, which is to the east of Egypt.
8 He took Agag king of the Amalekites alive and, executing the curse of destruction, put all the people to the sword.
9 But Saul and the army spared Agag with the best of the sheep and cattle, the fatlings and lambs and all that was good. They did not want to consign these to the curse of destruction; they consigned only what was poor and worthless.
10 The word of Yahweh came to Samuel,
11 'I regret having made Saul king, since he has broken his allegiance to me and not carried out my orders.' Samuel was appalled and cried to Yahweh all night long.
12 In the morning, Samuel set off to find Saul. Samuel was told, 'Saul has been to Carmel, to raise himself a monument there, but now has turned about, moved on and gone down to Gilgal.'
13 When Samuel reached Saul, Saul said, 'May you be blessed by Yahweh! I have carried out Yahweh's orders.'
14 Samuel replied, 'Then what is this bleating of sheep in my ears and the lowing of cattle that I hear?'
15 Saul said, 'They have been brought from Amalek, the people having spared the best of the sheep and cattle to sacrifice them to Yahweh, your God; the rest we have consigned to the curse of destruction.'
16 Samuel then said to Saul, 'Stop! Let me tell you what Yahweh said to me last night.' He said, 'Go on.'
17 Samuel said, 'Small as you may be in your own eyes, are you not the leader of the tribes of Israel? Yahweh has anointed you as king of Israel.
18 When Yahweh sent you on a mission he said to you, "Go and put those sinners, the Amalekites, under the curse of destruction and make war on them until they are exterminated."
19 Why then did you not obey Yahweh's voice? Why did you fall on the booty and do what is wrong in Yahweh's eyes?'
20 Saul replied to Samuel, 'But I did obey Yahweh's voice. I went on the mission which Yahweh gave me; I brought back Agag king of the Amalekites; I put Amalek under the curse of destruction;
21 and from the booty the people have taken the best sheep and cattle of what was under the curse of destruction only to sacrifice them to Yahweh your God in Gilgal.'
22 To which, Samuel said: Is Yahweh pleased by burnt offerings and sacrifices or by obedience to Yahweh's voice? Truly, obedience is better than sacrifice, submissiveness than the fat of rams.
23 Rebellion is a sin of sorcery, presumption a crime of idolatry! 'Since you have rejected Yahweh's word, he has rejected you as king.'
24 Saul then said to Samuel, 'I have sinned, having broken Yahweh's order and your instructions because I was afraid of the people and yielded to their demands.
25 Now, please forgive my sin and come back with me, so that I can worship Yahweh.'
26 Samuel said to Saul, 'I will not come back with you, since you have rejected Yahweh's word and Yahweh has rejected you as king of Israel.'
27 As Samuel turned away to leave, Saul caught at the hem of his cloak and it tore,
28 and Samuel said to him, 'Today Yahweh has torn the kingdom of Israel from you and given it to a neighbour of yours who is better than you.'
29 (The Glory of Israel, however, does not lie or go back on his word, not being human and liable to go back on his word.)
30 'I have sinned,' Saul said, 'but please still show me respect in front of my people's elders and in front of Israel, and come back with me, so that I can worship Yahweh your God.'
31 Samuel followed Saul back and Saul worshipped Yahweh.
32 Samuel then said, 'Bring me Agag king of the Amalekites!' Agag came towards him unsteadily saying, 'Truly death is bitter!'
33 Samuel said: As your sword has left women childless, so will your mother be left childless among women! Samuel then butchered Agag before Yahweh at Gilgal.
34 Samuel left for Ramah, and Saul went up home to Gibeah of Saul.
35 Samuel did not see Saul again till his dying day. Samuel indeed mourned over Saul, but Yahweh regretted having made Saul king of Israel.

7 Categories of Pharisees

Seven Types of Pharisees:
  1. The Shoulder (or Shechemite) Pharisee: This type of pharisee was one who wore his good deeds on his shoulder – on display for all men to see. Jesus opens his primary criticism of Pharisees in Matthew, with the mention of the shoulder – possibly a reference to this commonly-labeled type of Pharisee
    They tie up heavy loads and put them on men’s shoulders, but they themselves are not willing to lift a finger to move them. (Matthew 23:4)
  2. The Wait-a-little Pharisee: This type of pharisee would want to wait to see how a situation played out before acting in any matter. While he agreed with Pharisee theology, he would always fall short in practice of his ‘belief’ because he wasn’t sure if he should/could/wanted to act. This type of Pharisee liked the prestige brought about by being a religious leader, but didn’t like what it actually required.
    Everything they do is done for men to see: They make their phylacteries wide and the tassels on their garments long; they love the place of honor at banquets and the most important seats in the synagogues; they love to be greeted in the marketplaces and to have men call them ‘Rabbi.’ (Matthew 23:5-7)
  3. The Blind (or Bruised and Bleeding) Pharisee: This type of Pharisee was typified by the idea of him walking with his head down or turned away to avoid looking at, or bumping into women (who might be on their menstrual cycle) or other unclean folks. So, because they weren’t looking where they were going, they would end up bruised or bleeding from their avoidance of small things (cleanliness laws) – all the while forgetting the more important laws. Jesus refers to some Pharisees as ‘blind guides’, possibly referring to this type of Pharisee.
    Woe to you, teachers of the law and Pharisees, you hypocrites! You give a tenth of your spices – mint, dill and cumin. But you have neglected the more important matters of the law – justice, mercy and faithfulness. You should have practiced the latter, without neglecting the former. You blind guides! You strain out a gnat but swallow a camel. (Matthew 23:23-24)
  4. The Pestle (or Hump-backed) Pharisee: Similar to the Blind Pharisee, the Pestle Pharisee was known for walking around with his eyes averted for the purpose of avoiding visual temptations. Avoiding temptation is one thing, but this type of Pharisee’s heart was wrong, because it was the importance of making a show of his avoidance of temptation (and piety) which was to be criticized.
    Woe to you, teachers of the law and Pharisees, you hypocrites! You are like whitewashed tombs, which look beautiful on the outside but on the inside are full of dead men’s bones and everything unclean. In the same way, on the outside you appear to people as righteous but on the inside you are full of hypocrisy and wickedness. (Matthew 23:27-28)
  5. The Ever-Reckoning Pharisee: Here was a religious person who was always keeping score – trying to make sure that his good deeds always outnumbered his bad ones. He wanted this so that God would be in his debt with the attitude of God oweing him something for being good. Their belief was truly one of works-based righteousness.
    “Woe to you, teachers of the law and Pharisees, you hypocrites! You build tombs for the prophets and decorate the graves of the righteous. And you say, ‘If we had lived in the days of our forefathers, we would not have taken part with them in shedding the blood of the prophets.’ So you testify against yourselves that you are the descendants of those who murdered the prophets. Fill up, then, the measure of the sin of your forefathers!” (Matthew 23:29-32)
  6. The God-fearing (or Timid) Pharisee: He was considered to be a ‘God-fearer’ in the manner of Job. While he had great reverence and respect for God, it was out of fear of punishment, he made sure to follow all of God’s commands in order avoid curses from God and, ultimately, hellfire. Unlike the previous types of Pharisees, both his belief and practice were correct, but his motivation was out of fear of God. It is possible that Jesus’ expressed woe in Matthew 23:13 is directed at this spirit of fear that then prevents others from enjoying the eternal life provided by God
    Woe to you, teachers of the law and Pharisees, you hypocrites! You shut the kingdom of heaven in men’s faces. You yourselves do not enter, nor will you let those enter who are trying to. (Matthew 23:13)
  7. The God-loving Pharisee: This type of Pharisee was considered to be the ideal – a person who obeyed God out of true love and affection for Him, as in the manner of Abraham. A minority of Pharisees were believed to have been of this type, though Pharisees from the School of Hillel (who died just prior to Jesus’ ministry) may have comprised a majority of this type of Pharisee. Nicodemus, Joseph of Arimathea and Paul (and most likely Gamaliel, as well, from both Biblical and extra-Biblical accounts) were all Pharisees who would have fit into this category.

Covenant Formula

The Covenant Formula:

An Exegetical and Theological Investigation

God's covenant with Israel is one of the most important themes of Old Testament scholarship: 'I will be your God, you shall be my people'. Yet this has only rarely been the focus of a comprehensive study.Professor Rendtorff explores the different ways the covenant formula is used in the Bible, its structural and theological functions, the connections between covenant and election.An important contribution to a canonical interpretation of the Hebrew Bible.

Example: The cooking of animals, spliting them apart, eating together - two parts of the covenant.

Break apart = what will happen if you break the covenant.
Eat, consume = bring the covenant into your body.

The Elders

Independent global leaders working together for peace and human rights.

The Elders

Sentinel

A soldier or guard whose job is to stand and keep watch.

Jim Taylor-Firming

I met Jim at the MROP Firming.  His profile thru Google, ["jim taylor" texas mrop weaver] is on LinkedIn. 



Jim Taylor's Overview

Current
  • Pastorat Mosaic Community Church
  • Weaverat Men As Learners and Elders (MALES)
Past
Education
  • Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary
  • Texas State University-San Marcos
Pastor

Mosaic Community Church


January 1999Present (14 years)
I pastor an emerging church (Mosaic Community Church) in Seguin, Texas. Mosaic has a vision to live within the creative imagination of God. As we see it, that means embracing Christ, embracing one another in Community, and embracing the rest of Creation. Nothing gets pushed out except for the resistance of His dream. We know it's messy, but God is in the middle of all of it ... Jim pastors a transitional church on its way into a spiritually postmodern world. After more than a decade of journey together, they believe they're on a good path. A relational paradigm informs their theology and practice. Jim and his wife, Lynda, have three girls: Abby(17), Megan(16), & Emma(14). A beautifully, loving family.

The Waking - I learn by going where I have to go

I learn by going where I have to go is the line that brought me to this poem.


I wake to sleep, and take my waking slow.
I feel my fate in what I cannot fear.
I learn by going where I have to go.

We think by feeling. What is there to know?
I hear my being dance from ear to ear.
I wake to sleep, and take my waking slow.

Of those so close beside me, which are you?
God bless the Ground! I shall walk softly there,
And learn by going where I have to go.

Light takes the Tree; but who can tell us how?
The lowly worm climbs up a winding stair;
I wake to sleep, and take my waking slow.

Great Nature has another thing to do
To you and me, so take the lively air,
And, lovely, learn by going where to go.

This shaking keeps me steady. I should know.
What falls away is always. And is near.
I wake to sleep, and take my waking slow.
I learn by going where I have to go.

Ash-Wednesday T.S. Eliot

Teach us to care and not to care  ... is the sentence that brought me to this poem...

Ash Wednesday
T.S. Eliot

Because I do not hope to turn again
Because I do not hope
Because I do not hope to turn
Desiring this man's gift and that man's scope
I no longer strive to strive towards such things
(Why should the agèd eagle stretch its wings?)
Why should I mourn
The vanished power of the usual reign?

Because I do not hope to know
The infirm glory of the positive hour
Because I do not think
Because I know I shall not know
The one veritable transitory power
Because I cannot drink
There, where trees flower, and springs flow, for there is 
nothing again

Because I know that time is always time
And place is always and only place
And what is actual is actual only for one time
And only for one place
I rejoice that things are as they are and
I renounce the blessèd face
And renounce the voice
Because I cannot hope to turn again
Consequently I rejoice, having to construct something
Upon which to rejoice

And pray to God to have mercy upon us
And pray that I may forget
These matters that with myself I too much discuss
Too much explain
Because I do not hope to turn again
Let these words answer
For what is done, not to be done again
May the judgement not be too heavy upon us

Because these wings are no longer wings to fly
But merely vans to beat the air
The air which is now thoroughly small and dry
Smaller and dryer than the will
Teach us to care and not to care 

Teach us to sit still.

Pray for us sinners now and at the hour of our death
Pray for us now and at the hour of our death.


II 
Lady, three white leopards sat under a juniper-tree
In the cool of the day, having fed to sateity
On my legs my heart my liver and that which had been 
contained
In the hollow round of my skull. And God said
Shall these bones live? shall these
Bones live? And that which had been contained
In the bones (which were already dry) said chirping:
Because of the goodness of this Lady
And because of her loveliness, and because
She honours the Virgin in meditation,
We shine with brightness. And I who am here dissembled
Proffer my deeds to oblivion, and my love
To the posterity of the desert and the fruit of the gourd.
It is this which recovers
My guts the strings of my eyes and the indigestible portions
Which the leopards reject. The Lady is withdrawn
In a white gown, to contemplation, in a white gown.
Let the whiteness of bones atone to forgetfulness.
There is no life in them. As I am forgotten
And would be forgotten, so I would forget
Thus devoted, concentrated in purpose. And God said
Prophesy to the wind, to the wind only for only
The wind will listen. And the bones sang chirping
With the burden of the grasshopper, saying

Lady of silences
Calm and distressed
Torn and most whole
Rose of memory
Rose of forgetfulness
Exhausted and life-giving
Worried reposeful
The single Rose
Is now the Garden
Where all loves end
Terminate torment
Of love unsatisfied
The greater torment
Of love satisfied
End of the endless
Journey to no end
Conclusion of all that
Is inconclusible
Speech without word and
Word of no speech
Grace to the Mother
For the Garden
Where all love ends.

Under a juniper-tree the bones sang, scattered and shining
We are glad to be scattered, we did little good to each other,
Under a tree in the cool of day, with the blessing of sand,
Forgetting themselves and each other, united
In the quiet of the desert. This is the land which ye
Shall divide by lot. And neither division nor unity
Matters. This is the land. We have our inheritance.



III 

At the first turning of the second stair
I turned and saw below
The same shape twisted on the banister
Under the vapour in the fetid air
Struggling with the devil of the stairs who wears
The deceitul face of hope and of despair.

At the second turning of the second stair
I left them twisting, turning below;
There were no more faces and the stair was dark,
Damp, jaggèd, like an old man's mouth drivelling, beyond 
repair,
Or the toothed gullet of an agèd shark.

At the first turning of the third stair
Was a slotted window bellied like the figs's fruit
And beyond the hawthorn blossom and a pasture scene
The broadbacked figure drest in blue and green
Enchanted the maytime with an antique flute.
Blown hair is sweet, brown hair over the mouth blown,
Lilac and brown hair;
Distraction, music of the flute, stops and steps of the mind
over the third stair, 
Fading, fading; strength beyond hope and despair
Climbing the third stair.


Lord, I am not worthy
Lord, I am not worthy

but speak the word only. 

IV 
Who walked between the violet and the violet
Whe walked between
The various ranks of varied green
Going in white and blue, in Mary's colour,
Talking of trivial things
In ignorance and knowledge of eternal dolour
Who moved among the others as they walked,
Who then made strong the fountains and made fresh the 
springs

Made cool the dry rock and made firm the sand
In blue of larkspur, blue of Mary's colour,
Sovegna vos

Here are the years that walk between, bearing
Away the fiddles and the flutes, restoring
One who moves in the time between sleep and waking, 
wearing

White light folded, sheathing about her, folded.
The new years walk, restoring
Through a bright cloud of tears, the years, restoring
With a new verse the ancient rhyme. Redeem
The time. Redeem
The unread vision in the higher dream
While jewelled unicorns draw by the gilded hearse.

The silent sister veiled in white and blue
Between the yews, behind the garden god,
Whose flute is breathless, bent her head and signed but 
spoke no word

But the fountain sprang up and the bird sang down
Redeem the time, redeem the dream
The token of the word unheard, unspoken

Till the wind shake a thousand whispers from the yew

And after this our exile



If the lost word is lost, if the spent word is spent
If the unheard, unspoken
Word is unspoken, unheard;
Still is the unspoken word, the Word unheard,
The Word without a word, the Word within
The world and for the world;
And the light shone in darkness and
Against the Word the unstilled world still whirled
About the centre of the silent Word.



O my people, what have I done unto thee.


Where shall the word be found, where will the word
Resound? Not here, there is not enough silence
Not on the sea or on the islands, not
On the mainland, in the desert or the rain land,
For those who walk in darkness
Both in the day time and in the night time
The right time and the right place are not here
No place of grace for those who avoid the face
No time to rejoice for those who walk among noise and deny 
the voice

Will the veiled sister pray for
Those who walk in darkness, who chose thee and oppose 
thee,
Those who are torn on the horn between season and season, 
time and time, between
Hour and hour, word and word, power and power, those who 
wait
In darkness? Will the veiled sister pray
For children at the gate
Who will not go away and cannot pray:
Pray for those who chose and oppose


O my people, what have I done unto thee.


Will the veiled sister between the slender
Yew trees pray for those who offend her
And are terrified and cannot surrender
And affirm before the world and deny between the rocks
In the last desert before the last blue rocks
The desert in the garden the garden in the desert
Of drouth, spitting from the mouth the withered apple-seed.



O my people.



VI 
Although I do not hope to turn again
Although I do not hope
Although I do not hope to turn

Wavering between the profit and the loss
In this brief transit where the dreams cross
The dreamcrossed twilight between birth and dying
(Bless me father) though I do not wish to wish these things
From the wide window towards the granite shore
The white sails still fly seaward, seaward flying
Unbroken wings

And the lost heart stiffens and rejoices
In the lost lilac and the lost sea voices
And the weak spirit quickens to rebel
For the bent golden-rod and the lost sea smell
Quickens to recover
The cry of quail and the whirling plover
And the blind eye creates
The empty forms between the ivory gates
And smell renews the salt savour of the sandy earth

This is the time of tension between dying and birth
The place of solitude where three dreams cross
Between blue rocks
But when the voices shaken from the yew-tree drift away
Let the other yew be shaken and reply.

Blessèd sister, holy mother, spirit of the fountain, spirit of the 
garden,
Suffer us not to mock ourselves with falsehood
Teach us to care and not to care
Teach us to sit still
Even among these rocks,
Our peace in His will
And even among these rocks
Sister, mother
And spirit of the river, spirit of the sea,
Suffer me not to be separated

And let my cry come unto Thee.

Ash Wednesday
T.S. Eliot
 

Monday, December 3, 2012

Opportunity for Opportunity

I'm at an inflection point.  According the the acturial tables, I've got 22 years left.  I've been in ABQ for 22 years.  My children are 22 years old.  What shall I do with the remaining 22 years?  I have an opportunity for opportunity.

Owl

Can see what others can't; essence of true wisdom.  Protector of the home.